Saturday, November 15, 2014

Interstellar




Interstellar rolls on like a long crescendoing symphony: Adagio movement – the dying earth, Allegro – space, and Scherzo – the black hole. And although the planets and the void provide a gorgeous and fascinating (if not confusing) structure to the opus, this song has as much to do with sentiment as it does with outer space. It’s an ambitious composition with big themes. Both the heart and head parts of Interstellar are complex and large-scale things, and you’ll need to stay frosty to hang in if you see it.

Interstellar’s space-time anthem takes place in an earth time – maybe not too far in the future it seems – when the world has turned against its inhabitants. Blight and global famine have reduced mankind and its governments down to a single focus on survival. Society is dotted with advanced technology – relics of what was. But the little that is left is not maintained, given up on for the more basic cause of putting food on the table. Technology is almost shunned as if maybe it were the cause of earth’s current challenges. This makes Cooper, our protagonist played by Matthew McConaughey, an anachronism on his rapidly changing earth – he’s an engineer and space pilot with no more ships to fly. He farms now, like most others do, and rages against the blight and the dust hoping, like most others do, that the next year and the next crop will be better… but it wont be better. 


Peculiar circumstances guide Cooper, a widower raising two children on his corn farm (one of the few crops that will grow these days), and his high-IQ daughter Murphy to what is left of NASA. There, Cooper meets back up with an old mentor and teacher, Professor Brand (Michael Caine), who is working on an escape strategy for those left on the dying earth. Mankind’s exodus will be made possible by the mysterious appearance of a wormhole near Saturn. Its origin is unknown but its timely arrival must be more than coincidence. NASA has sent missions through the hole already and has identified three potentially habitable planets. They are preparing an experimental spacecraft to travel through the hole to recover the previous missions’ data and determine if there is a suitable planet. Coop is the perfect pilot for this trip but there is a catch ­– traveling through the wormhole messes with time. What will be weeks and months for the travelers will be years on earth. This, Professor Brand explains, will give him time to solve the main problem of moving all of humanity to the new home… gravity, but those Coop leaves behind will be much older than him, or worse, if and when he returns.

Those with music backgrounds will likely be commenting in their head to me that the first movement of a symphony is usually fast paced – not an adagio. They’d be right of course, but Interstellar is a slow starter. It even feels a bit awkward as we trudge through the motivation for it all and get used to McConaughey as an astronaut and, oh yeah, Anne Hathaway as an astrophysicist (Brand’s daughter). But writer and director Christopher Nolan (Batman Begins, Inception) must set up the dissonance – what guided Cooper to NASA, where did the worm hole come from, who wins the race against time, man or nature (or man’s nature)? – I told you it was ambitious. But every thing starts to harmonize in space where McConaughey and the rest hit their stride.


The influences of past sci-fi film makers on Interstellar are very evident – Nolan has admitted as much: the space ballets of 2001: A Space Odyssey, and the used feel of Aliens’ ships and space stations for examples. But the story is more closely comparable to that of Contact – big and bold and beyond us sometimes. Some will find Nolan’s resolution in Interstellar to consonance incredible… others may find it inane as he pits the human attributes of faith and love up against instinct and logic. He’s trying to cover all bases, striving for the cold science and beauty of 2001 and the heart and magic of Spielberg films like Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Yes, Interstellar is a very, very ambitious work. Not all of the film’s goals are completely obtained I think – they seem just outside of an impossible reach. But it gets us most of the way there and that feels like more than enough. 8 out of 10.

1 comment:

  1. This was one of the best movies that I have seen in years! I really want to see it again soon and continue to dig into it. I have to say that I very much appreciated the the two years of college physics, including a semester of astrophysics, that I had under my belt going into this movie. It was really well done, in my opinion, and your review was spot-on, Pat! Cheers! Chris

    ReplyDelete