J.J. Abrams reboot of the Star Trek
series in 2009 created a new universe in which James Kirk and his crew could explore
new worlds and go where no man has gone
before. A universe altered by the old-reliable sci-fi restart button… time
travel. Now, in Star Trek Into Darkness,
Abrams picks up where he dropped us off in 2009; placing our old friends in
familiar poses but in different, even inverted or transposed, settings and circumstances
from what we remember from the original Trek history.
But this second venture in
space is not quite as good as the first. Long-time fans of the series (TV and
motion picture) will be pleased that Abrams continues to inject vintage
components from the old Star Trek franchise into these new films. Old names
with new faces will trigger the desired nostalgic response from the faithful.
But just a bit of the specialness of having our old buddies back with us has
worn off.
As with all of the Kirk-era
Star Treks, the movie works best when the crew is engaged in its patented interplay…
cocky Kirk riding his star ship like a wild horse, Spock responding with the
single raised eyebrow, and the rest throwing in there special moves – all is
the same but all slightly different… in good and interesting ways. Benedict
Cumberbatch is outstanding as the enemy (or is he ally?), who is new to this crew's pseudo-parallel universe but well known, from another past, to long-time Star Trek viewers. But
alas, writers and director eventually fall into typical summer-action-film excess
and the misconception that if 10 explosions is good then 100 is better.
Fortunately the CGI action is not as bombastic and laborious as other summer
blockbusters such as Iron Man III or Man of Steal, but it does overwhelm at
times. Although Abbrams fails to completely sustain the magic of his first Star
Trek, Into Darkness is still worth
the price of the ticket and is the best of the early summer action films. – 7 out
of 10.
No comments:
Post a Comment